Kant Vs Mill on the Issue of Lying Essay -- Philosophy, Ethics

Firstly, by looking at the first patient, whether she gets a kidney from her father or a cadaver kidney , there will be no difference be stir she needs a kidney nonetheless. The second patient however, cannot agree to give his kidney away because one of the main reasons is that hes scared and lacks the fearlessness to make this donation9. So right at this point, it can be seen that it would be better if the father didnt give his kidney away because it wouldnt cause him any happiness, whereas the daughter has two options to gIn everyday life, whether on a personal base or on a professional base, difficult scenarios, or also known as moral dilemmas, are present. Depending on whom the person is or what their belief and value systems are, the issue can be resolved. In this particular case, questions arise ab place whether it is morally right to lie to family members when something can be done, ignoring the fact of its after effects. The case will be explained in expand later on includin g the patients state, but to answer this ethical question, two theorists will be presented for the con and pro side. For the con side, the deontologist Immanuel Kant will be presented with his theory that lying is prohibited under all circumstances, as for the pro side, rear end Stuart Mill will be presented for the utilitarian theory stating that whichever decision brings out the most happiness is the right decision. After discussing the case, my personal view of what is right will be stated with my own reasons, which is that lying is the right decision to be taken. This case study which is taken from Robert M. Veatchs Medical Ethics book is about a 5 year old girl, who from the last 3 years, has been scummy from progressive renal failure which... ...nication for no one would be saying the truth. et a donor kidney. BooksHill, Thomas E., Categorical and Hypothetical Imperatives. In The Blackwell guide to Kants ethics. Chichester, U.K. Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. 5-9. Rachels, Jam es, and Stuart Rachels. 7,8,9,10. In The elements of moral philosophy. 6th ed. New York McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2010. 97-145. Veatch, Robert M.,The Normative Principles of Medical Ethics. In Medical ethics. 1997. Reprint, Boston, MA Jones and Bartlett, 1989 29-56. Websitesconsequentialist. Dictionary.com. Dictionary.com Unabridged. Random House, Inc. http//dictionary.reference.com/browse/consequentialist (accessed December 05, 2011).Mill, John Stuart. Utilitarianism by John Stuart Mill. Utilitarianism past, present and future. http//www.utilitarianism.com/mill2.htm (accessed December 05, 2011).